Classroom cell phone use policy making: of the people, by the people

Well, here it is! I’ve finished creating a set of lesson plans to be used in the most advanced class that the ESL Program where I teach offers. I’m looking forward to taking them on a test drive when I return to the classroom in the fall. Given that I had problems over the course of the semester that led me to very nearly drop this class, I just want to take a moment to celebrate that I got this far:

                                               Credit: Giphy

Here’s an overview of what I’ve come up with for my final project of ECI832:

For those of you who are new to this project, here’s where I started.  I was thinking about Ribble’s 9 Elements of Digital Citizenship, specifically what he says about Digital Communication, Digital Etiquette, Digital Rights and Responsibilities. I wrote more about the connection to these elements that I saw my project having in an earlier post. I decided I wanted to do something about the issues other ESL instructors and I have with inappropriate cell phone use in our classrooms.  Of course phones and other devices can be put to great use when built into a lesson, but let’s face it, they can be major distractions, and can take away from the learning environment and in person social connection that develops in an intensive ESL program like mine.

I started out reading several articles on the topic of cell phone use in classrooms, the impact of distractions on learning, and how cell phone policies imposed from the top down don’t work well.  I gave links and summaries of a few of those articles in two blog posts, the one mentioned above as well as a later post.

As mentioned in my previous blog about this project, my objectives for this set of lessons are to:

  • Get students thinking about the pros and cons of smart phone use during class time and class break times
  • Introduce vocabulary related to classroom smart phone use
  • Have students work together to propose a set of guidelines for their own classroom smart phone use
  • Have communicative, integrated-skill lessons that students find engaging

It turned out that I had a lot more I wanted to do with this topic than I could fit into one class, and so I’ve ended up with lesson plans for three separate days spread out over a week: Day One’s lesson is 1 hour and 50 minutes; Day Two’s lesson is 1 hour and 25 minutes; Day Three’s lesson is a brief 50 minutes.

Here are brief screen cast videos showing the PowerPoint file I created for use with these three lessons:

Day One:

(here’s the Nomophobia Questionnaire, in case anyone’s interested in taking it)

Day Two:

Day Three:

In case anyone is interested in using/modifying this idea in their classrooms, here are the lesson plans for the three days. Before I leave you with those, I’ll sign off with a reminder to feel free to comment on what you’ve seen here or contact me directly. I also want to thank my classmates and my prof, Dr. Alec Couros, for a great learning experience this semester. I feel more in touch with the 21st Century now that I did before taking this class, and I’ll also have several new considerations regarding media literacy and digital citizenship when I return to teaching in September.

Thanks for reading!



Day One’s Plan (1 hour and 50 minute lesson; 10-minute break after 55-minutes):

Slides 1-2 0 minutes Tell the class that you’d like to talk about cell phone use in the classroom, but to begin you’d like them to think about their cell phone habits in general.

Begin the PowerPoint presentation.

Slide 3 8 minutes Have students discuss the questions in small groups; elicit answers for whole class follow-up
Slide 4 2 minutes Introduce the vocab challenge

Divide the class into two teams: Team Phone and Team No Phone

Slide 5 5 minutes Show the words and say them each out loud once (students can repeat if they want)

Have students in Team Phone leave the room

20 minutes Students are working on the vocab challenge in teams
20 minutes Students from Team Phone return to the room.

Move desks to the sides of the room

Introduce and play the fly swatter game:

·         Have the 14 words written in large letters on the black/white board in advance

·         Have students in their teams line up down the centre of the room.

·         Hand the student first in line of each team a fly swatter

·         Loudly read out or act out a clue that indicates one of the words on the board.

·         The students holding the fly swatter need to consult their teams (if necessary) and then run up to the board to “swat” the word that corresponds to my clue.  The team member to swat the correct word first scores one point for her/his team.

Review each of the words, answering questions and eliciting sample sentences on request.

10-minute break
Slide 6 1 minutes Show the slide and say the word “nomophobia.” Ask students to guess what this word means.
Slide 7 2 minutes Show the slide and read the definition and sample sentence to the class.

Ask if anyone has heard of this term, or if they know of a similar term in English or in their language.

Slide 8 27 minutes Hand out the nomophobia questionnaire and ask students to fill it out.

Tell students to write a number from 1-7 beside each of the 20 questions, and then ask them to total up their scores.

Have them discuss the questions on Slide 8 with the student next to them.

Slide 9 5 minutes Have students think about the questions on Slide 9 for 1-2 minutes, and then have them share their answers with their partner.
Slides 10 and 11 10 minutes Go over Slide 10 with the students.  (Fill in the date on this slide in advance – the date when you’ll carry on to “Day Two” of this lesson).

Hand out the small pieces of paper for them to track the number of times they look at or use their phone during a 50-minute lesson.  Tell them to write a check mark for each time they look at their phone for an “on topic” (class related) reason, and an “x” each time they look at their phone for an “off topic” (not class related) reason.  (The teacher should distribute them at the start of a lesson and collect them at the end).

Show Slide 11 as an example of what we’ll do when we move on to Day Two.

Explain the homework assignment.

Thank them and dismiss for break/end of day.

Day Two’s Plan (1 hour 25-minute lesson):

Slide 12 0 minutes Introduce the topic of the lesson.
Slide 13 15 minutes Hand out their small papers with their tracking of their cell phone use. Give them a couple of minutes to calculate the average number of times they look at their phone for “on topic” and “off topic” reasons in a 50-minute lesson.

Poll the class with questions like “how many of you look at your phone for on topic reasons between 0-4 times in an average 50-minute lesson?”

Select the appropriate number of squares on the table on this slide. Using the “shading” feature (top bar, centre of the page), select the colour you want to use.  Continue this way until all students have told you how often they look at their phone for “on topic” and “off topic” reasons.

Slide 14 10 In pairs, have students read the chart and answer the questions on Slide 14 (keep slide 13 up, though).

Have a few students report their statements to the class, correcting grammar where appropriate.

Slide 15 5 minutes Have students discuss their answers to the questions on Slide 15 in pairs.
Slide 16 5 minutes Have students discuss their answers to the questions on Slide 16 in pairs.
Slide 17 20 minutes Have the pairs fill in the t-chart on Slide 17 (using their own paper).

Have a reporter from each pair report one point to the class and fill in the chart on the PowerPoint with notes from everyone.

Slide 18 1 minute Introduce the question for the next phase of the lesson.
Slide 19 10 minutes Have students work in pairs to fill in the mindmap.
15 minutes Have the pairs call out information from their mindmaps and compile it on a large paper (poster board); alternatively, students in pairs or groups could put their thoughts directly onto poster board that you then have them pin to the wall and share.
Slide 20 4 minutes Summarize the discussion and have students answer the question on Slide 20.

Day Three’s Plan (50-minute lesson):

Slide 21 0 minutes Introduce the topic of the lesson.
Slide 22 1 minute Review the discussion from the previous lesson.
Slide 23 27 minutes Have students look at Slide 23. Have them discuss their opinions with a partner.

Ask if anyone has another option to add to the list as an “other” way to have limited cell phone use in the time (for instance, only on one or two days of the week? Only for solo work, but never for group work?).

Have students discuss their opinions in pairs or small groups.

Ask students to vote!

Slide 24 (optional) 10 minutes, or longer as necessary. If the class is somewhat divided, have students give their reasons in support of their opinions in an informal debate.

If there is a strong division in the class, proceed to put students into groups that can debate this topic further (carry on with this stage at this time, or save it for another day’s lesson).

Slide 25 1 minute Determine if a debate needs to take place, and prepare for one if necessary.
Slides 26 and 27 10 minutes Show Slide 26 so students see what we’re aiming to accomplish.

Have students discuss the two questions/scenarios on Slide 27.

Have them share other ideas they come up with.

Have them vote, if necessary, and then finish filling out Slide 26.

Slide 28 1 minute Thank them!
follow-up Monitor how things play out!

Interview with my 8 year-old on digital citizenship (a.k.a. my summary of learning )

Hey all in EC&I 832, here’s the vid for my Summary of Learning:

I’d like to thank my eight year-old for being such a great interviewer, if only slightly distracted by the bribe (chocolate) I used…

Thanks, too, to my prof for this course, Dr. Alec Couros, and to my classmates for all of their contributions.

I haven’t yet figured out how to embed my WordArt word cloud, but please stay tuned for updates on this blog entry…




Developing lesson plans and materials for an in-depth conversation on student cell phone use

I’ve started creating a lesson plan and materials for this project, and I’d like to share how things are looking so far.  For those new to my project, I am aiming to create a lesson (or a series of lessons) that would get my adult ESL students reflecting on their own cell phone use – outside, but mostly inside the classroom. The objectives so far are to:

  • Get students thinking about the pros and cons of smart phone use during class time and class break times
  • Introduce vocabulary related to the topic
  • Have students work together to propose a student-created classroom cell phone policy for their class only (whether this means there are no guidelines at all, a few guidelines for time-restricted use, complete removal of cell phones during lesson time, or something else altogether)
  • Have a communicative, integrated-skill activity that students find engaging

I’ve decided to start off by focusing on our most advanced ESL class, but will also eventually modify the lesson so that it’s suitable for two intermediate levels as well.

So, for a first step, I’m going to have students begin by thinking about their cell phone habits in general, with questions such as,  “how much time do you spend using your phone in an average day?” I’ll then have them take the “Nomophobia Questionnaire,” mostly to spark interest in the topic and get them thinking about it. (Just to note, for the more advanced level classes, I’m considering getting them to read an article and/or watch a video on nomophobia as well, and there will likely be some writing that comes out of this set of lessons too.  I’m still working out how I’d integrate those components to the lesson, but I do want to end up with an integrated-skills set of activities.)

Students will be asked to discuss their results of the nomophobia questionnaire in small (3-4 student) groups, with focused questions such as:

  • Did your score surprise you? Why or why not?
  • Did any specific question(s) surprise you? Why?
  • Do you feel you need to change your cell phone habits or attitude? Why or why not?

From there, I’ll guide the class towards thinking about their classroom cell phone use specifically.  They’ll be asked to discuss these two questions in their groups:

  • How many times do you look at your phone in an average 50-minute class?
  • Of the times you use your phone in class, what percentage is on topic (class related use, such as looking for a translation to a word), and what percentage is off topic (not related to the class, such as checking a social media app or a message from a friend)?

Following that preliminary discussion, I’ll have the students look at a chart I’ve made, and I’ll explain that I’d like them to keep an approximate record of how many times they look at their phone during the next few classes so that we can fill it out at a later point.

How many times do you look at your cell phone during an average 50-minute class?

0-4 times 0-4 times 5-10 times 5-10 times 11-20 times 11-20 times Over 20 Over 20
Number of Students: On topic Off topic On topic Off topic On topic Off topic On topic Off topic

In the follow-up lesson, a few days (or a week) later, I will ask students to share how often they look at their phone during class, and would use “shading” on the graph to indicate how many students use their phones for on topic and off topic uses, and how often. As a class, we will practice chart-reading and making statements about the facts we see. This will be good practice of certain English grammar forms, such as the comparative and the superlative.  Discussing a graph interpretation is an indicator of an outcome our advanced-level students need to reach.

Students will once again be put into small groups and asked to discuss the following questions:

  • Do you sometimes get distracted from the class lesson because of things happening on your phone (such as receiving a message)?
  • Discuss what you feel happens to you when you are distracted by your phone during a class.
  • How do you feel when you see your classmates using their phones during a lesson?

The next set of discussion questions would get students thinking about how their cell phone use may or may not be influencing their English learning:

  • Of the time you spend on your phone, how much is in English?
  • In what ways can your cell phone help you improve your English?
  • Are there apps you use on your phone for learning or practicing English?

After discussing these questions, I’d have the groups each fill out the following chart:

Cell phone use in the ESL classroom
Advantages Disadvantages

Discussion would follow, of course, with some heated debate (I hope!).

This would lead to the next phase of the lesson (possibly on a third day – depending on how the teacher wishes to break things up) in which we’d begin to discuss our own ESL classroom and how we’d like cell phones to be incorporated into it.

My hope is that my lesson plans and materials will be of interest to my colleagues in the ESL Program, so that those of us who are interested can use them to open this discussion with our classes near the beginning of the term and therefore reduce the tension surrounding cell phone use in our classes that, to my understanding, is quite widespread.

That’s where I’m at for the moment. I’d love to get feedback from fellow students in my ECI832 class, or from anyone else “out there” who wishes to give it. 🙂

My daily news, and why I’m sad

My topic for this week is, “What does an average day look like for you in terms of reading and making sense of information, media, and the world around you? What are your personal strategies for analyzing and validating information (e.g. fake news or other information)?”

As someone who is just starting to adjust to a life on social media, I’m not yet at the point where I rely on it for my news… and after reading the articles my classmates have posted on social media and fake news, I think I’ll try to continue looking to more “old school” news sources even as I get accustomed to using social media for its other features and uses.

What does my average day look like in terms of how I get information and make sense of my world?  Well, I’ll start by saying that I can’t make sense of my world. What I learn about in the news constantly tells me that there is so much going on that I can’t understand and have no way of even beginning to understand.  I feel overwhelmed by the complexities of the moment we’re in, politically, socially, humanitarian-ly, and environmentally. There is just so much going on, and while some of it is good and inspiring, most of it is horrific and completely depressing. I also get very sick of seeing Trump’s ugly mug on my computer screen first thing in the morning. For these reasons, I try to keep in touch with the major events taking place, but I don’t allow myself to get too absorbed in any news forum. Basically, the time it takes for me to have my morning three cups of coffee is where the bulk of my news-viewing happens. What do I read during those three cups?  Well, pour yourself a cuppa and let me tell you…

In terms of my news sources, I stick to news agencies I feel I can trust to not spread fake news.  I spend my first cup of coffee of the day with CBC online.  It’s my homepage. I try to scan all of their headlines, but my focus is usually on their top stories, local stories, health, and tech and science sections. I also keep up with what they’re posting in their Indigenous section.

For my second cup of coffee, I’ll turn over to The Guardian. This British publication gives me a different perspective on world news stories, with great international writers, and their online articles are way more in depth. I highly recommend reading (and supporting) the Guardian. They also have a great video and documentary section.  For example, check out this scary interview with Christopher Wylie:

Then, if I get the time for a third cup of coffee, I’ll browse through the Tyee, a Vancouver-based independent news source that is, well, AWESOME.  Take a look at this two minute vid to see why:

So there you have it. I never allow myself more than three cups of coffee in the morning, so hence I’ve now introduced you to the three main sources of news I take in each day.  (Oh, I also listen to and support CBC radio 1, though I’m frustrated with them at the same time).  Occasionally, I’ll look at an article in the New York Times that arrives at our house every Wednesday, or the New Yorker we get delivered on Tuesdays, or the Harper’s that comes ones a month, but to be honest, with working full time, being a mom, a swimmer, and a ceramist, I don’t get in as much “deep news” reading as I’d like to. And as I said above, I need to protect myself from “bad-news-overload,” which can happen very easily.

Speaking of bad news, I found it disturbing to read in our materials for this week that “a false story is much more likely to go viral than a real story,” and that

“[a] false story reaches 1,500 people six times quicker, on average, than a true story does. And while false stories outperform the truth on every subject—including business, terrorism and war, science and technology, and entertainment—fake news about politics regularly does best.” (The Grim Conclusions of the Largest-Ever Study of Fake News).

The reasons given for this fact were that “fake news seems to be more ‘novel’ than real news” and “fake news evokes much more emotion than the average tweet.” The writer, Robinson Meyer, goes on to say that:

“The researchers created a database of the words that Twitter users used to reply to the 126,000 contested tweets, then analyzed it with a state-of-the-art sentiment-analysis tool. Fake tweets tended to elicit words associated with surprise and disgust, while accurate tweets summoned words associated with sadness and trust, they found.”

I guess that what this information tells me is that people would prefer to spend time thinking about and posting things that are surprising and/or disgusting rather than thinking about and posting things that are sad and/or true.  And that we have “less emotion” about real world events than about made up, fake ones.

This in itself makes me, well, sad.

I know I’m guilty of not wanting to get too absorbed by all the sad news out there, and thus not knowing as much about today’s world as I should, but I think I can say that I don’t allow myself to get distracted from the real state of things by looking at surprising or disgusting news items instead of the sad truth of the world’s affairs.  It seems like there’s this tendency out there to get all wrapped up over some disgusting, surprising, and maybe even “atrocious” yet ultimately NOT hugely important issue, and then leave less time for considering the major events taking place in the world today.  Let me know if you think I’ve got it wrong.

I think it’s sad that some people create and others spend their time on often trivial fake news stories, when the real “surprising and disgusting” stories are the ones that are true:

… how could anyone need to, or even try to, make up news that is more emotion-evoking, and even more disgusting than the recent shooting? More disgusting than the the refugee crisis? Than climate change, or the slow but steady “sixth mass extinction” we’re causing?

I guess, though, that the situation I’m talking about is nothing new. I smiled when I saw the quotation from Johnathan Swift in Carter Davis’ vlog: “Falsehood flies, and the truth comes limping after it.”

True.  But still, this is why I shy away from using social media to get my news.  I know I could be tempted to fly with the falsehoods, too.  However, not using social media as a news source doesn’t mean I feel I’m impervious to fake news… if I’ve learned anything in the recent weeks in this class, it’s that we can all be manipulated much more easily than we may realize. I feel I’m much more media-savvy now than I was before taking this class.  If nothing else, I’m more cautious about everything I do online.  I’ve learned from my classmates and from Alec (my prof) that there are tools out there that can remind us how to be critical of sources of information. For example, my classmate Regan Williams posted a great vlog in which she points us in the direction of EAVI Media Literacy and their tools for teaching/learning about this media literacy, and the info-graphic posted in Jaimie and Jocelyn‘s vlog with similar points to consider.

Once again, if you feel I have anything wrong in this post, please let me know. I certainly don’t want to be posting any more misinformation than what’s already out there. 😉

An issue to consider when teaching critical thinking in classrooms with students from different cultural backgrounds

My prompt for this week’s post is: What does it mean to be literate today? What might be some different elements of being “fully” literate (you might include digital, media, physical, or mathematical literacy, for example). I’m going to address the element of sociopolitical background when dealing with media literacy, and how students from non-democratic countries may experience an even greater challenge of coming to terms with media literacy if they have been systematically taught to not ask certain questions.

But first of all, what does it mean to be literate today? As many of my classmates have already spoken about in their content catalysts or blogged about in their weekly blog on this topic, being literate today must involve more than the ability to understand the information being presented in a message. With the prevalence of fake news, it is becoming all the more important to teach ourselves and our students the skills involved in critical thinking. Dani quoted a great website, Resource Ed, in her content catalyst video to share with us this quick definition of digital literacy:

digital literacy = digital tool knowledge + critical thinking + social engagement.

I also enjoyed watching Dr. Rob Williams’s TED talk on media literacy. Dr. Williams uses the parable of of the fish that “seldom thinks or is conscious about the water in which it swims” to illustrate his point that “skepticism is key to media literacy education.” Interestingly, after doing some digging around, I found out that it appears as though this “saying” originated from David Foster Wallace’s 2005 commencement address to Kenyon College, in which he begins his talk with “the standard requirement of US commencement speeches, the deployment of didactic little parable-ish stories”:

There are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says “Morning, boys. How’s the water?” And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes “What the hell is water?”

This provides a nice segue into my second question, what might be some “different elements of being ‘fully’ literate? I agree with Dr. Williams that being literate today must also mean being skeptical. However, I believe that part of our ability to be skeptical, to critically analyze, comes from the training we have via our families, our schools, and our societies about what and how much a person is allowed to criticize. In other words, we don’t all come from the same water.

I’m going to speak about my experience living and working in China for a while. First, I want to be clear that I am in no way suggesting that Chinese people are not able to think critically, analyze, or speak up on issues that concern them. One of my favourite artists is Ai Weiwei, who has made a career out being critical. I will, however, make a few generalizations based on my own observations and experiences in China for the sake of demonstrating the need to be aware of different sociopolitical backgrounds when teaching a multicultural group of students (such as is often, if not always, the case in Canada today).

When I went to Beijing in 2003 to teach ESL in the Beijing Language and Culture University, I quickly understood that I’d need to leave my naturally critical/skeptical side behind in most situation I’d encounter. For example, before even entering the classroom, I had to sign a contract that makes the Sask Education’s Professional Code of Ethics I was critical of in my last blog post seem absolutely liberating. Here is an excerpt from it:

As you may be able to make out from this photo of my contract (don’t ask my why I still have it!), I was not allowed to “speak in any way, or at any place, against the Chinese government.”  There were several other no-nos that I had to obey.  I was also told that people were not allowed to meet in groups larger than five while in public places on campus, and that meeting privately with others for any religious reason would get me into trouble. These are just a few of the examples of “state control” that I experienced while teaching in Beijing.

I’m not sure how much has changed.  I do know that back in 2003, democracy was “booming,” or so they claimed:

A page from my scrap book: article taken from the China Daily, March 20th 2003.

And along with democracy, human rights were also getting more attention in Beijing starting in 2003, and so greater freedoms were just about to become available:

China Daily, January 2003

This was China 15 years ago. I’m not sure how much has changed, but I have the sense that large-scale social reform takes a long time to filter into one’s mind and unconscious… If for generations you’ve been taught to be careful of certain forms of criticism, that ingrained trait isn’t likely going to change in a matter of years.  And in fact, I know that many of my Chinese students today are very surprised to hear me voice my opinions on all sorts of topics that they consider forbidden to discuss while in China. For this reason, critical thinking applied to many topics, especially those related to politics, is a concept that is a sensitive one for ESL teachers to broach at times. One needs to be careful so as not to come across as “critical” of “non-critical” thinking.

As you can see, coming from an adult ESL-instructor’s perspective, I can say that engaging my students in the issue of digital/media literacy is complicated.  While there is a huge difference between speaking critically of one’s government and knowing how to read an online article to assess its legitimacy, I feel that these two issues are connected. Critical thinking, overall, is not a skill that I believe is as highly valued in all countries as it is in Canada. So, for teachers with students who come from a variety of cultural and political backgrounds, we need to be sensitive to the different experiences, training, or even skill-sets that our students have.

Critical thinking… applied to the Code of Professional Ethics

What is a school’s role in educating students about digital citizenship?

Of the six content catalyst videos my classmates have posted on this topic, one key term comes up in each: critical thinking.

According to Luke Braun, we are “bombarded” by 4,000 to 10,000 commercial messages a day. As he succinctly puts it,  “students will spend all their adult lives in a multitasking, multifaceted, technology-driven diverse vibrant world and they must arrive equipped to do so.” Staci S. notes that “people’s ideas, attitudes, and beliefs are being put upon us and shaping our interpretation of the world around us.”

Clearly critical thinking is important. So let’s think critically about teaching critical thinking in this province for a moment.

During our “visit” form Patrick Maze last week, I was disturbed to listen to the conversation that went on about teachers having to censor what they share online.

I know that the case of the teacher being told to resign or be suspended because of a Facebook post of herself holding a drink happened in the States, not Canada, but nonetheless I heard in the conversation last week that many teachers here feel the need to be very careful about what they post.  There was discussion about the need for teachers to make sure that not only do they not post photos of themselves doing any behaviour that could be deemed inappropriate (such as even having a drink in a bar during their holidays), but also that teachers should ensure that friends/people around them are not taking photos of them that could be posted online.  I gather that no one has actually had disciplinary action taken against them in this province for anything posted online (let me know if I’m wrong, though), but even just having this concern about needing to surveil oneself sounds very hard to live with. I can’t really imagine being out with a group of people, some friends, some acquaintances, some strangers, having a good time and perhaps “letting go” a bit, and still needing to be aware of the threat that someone may post a photo of me that the Ministry of Education may deem inappropriate.  Is that how it really is? If so, I think that’s so unfortunate. As several people pointed out during our class last week, having a drink when you’re an adult on your vacation is not illegal…

Photo Credit: mitchell haindfield Flickr via Compfightcc

As a follow-up to that conversation, I’ve looked at the Code of Professional Ethics for this province, and here’s where I’m going to go out on a limb.  As a faculty member at a Canadian university, I think I can say with a fair degree of certainty that the majority of university faculty members in this country would rather strike than sign a document stating that they will “act at all times in a way that maintains the honour and dignity of the individual teacher and the teaching profession” (6.2.1). There was enough upheaval when the administration at the university where I teach put forward a Conflict of Interest and Conflict of Commitment Declaration which comes nowhere close to the explicit, but also at times vague, language that I see in the Code of Professional Ethics.

(Just as a note: I’m not  judging teachers for following this Code; I’m speaking from how I would feel if I had to).

My critical thinking about the Code goes like this:

Regarding 6.2.1, To act at all times in a way that maintains the honour and dignity of the individual teacher and the teaching profession:

  • at all times” – in my classroom, yes, but also while I’m preparing my classes, riding my bike to school, brushing my teeth, and going to bed?
  • maintain the honour and dignity of the individual teacher” – whose definition of “honour” are we using here? I’m afraid I didn’t see one in the footnotes.
  • honour and dignity of the […] the teaching profession” – can any teacher tell me that there hasn’t been a single moment in a classroom when they’ve been grateful their boss wasn’t watching just because, well, it wasn’t exactly their best example of honourable and dignified teaching?

Then there’s  6.2.3 of the Code: “To act in a manner that respects the collective interests of the profession

  • In my experience, there are often differing opinions of what is “the collective interest” of a profession. Does that never happen in K-12 education?

And 6.2.7: “To respect the right of students to form their own judgments based upon knowledge

  • What if a Student X’s judgments are severely racist/sexist/etc? Do I still need to respect her/his judgments?

And 6.2.8: “To support each student in reaching their highest levels of individual growth across intellectual, social-emotional, spiritual and physical domains

  • Um, excuse the English major here, but I have no idea what this means. Am I now my kindergarten students’ psychologist, Rabbi/Imam/Priest/First Nations’ spiritual leader or other spiritual leader, and physical trainer/nutritionist/etc.???

And 6.2.12: “to model the fulfilment of social and political responsibilities associated with membership in the community.” In my opinion, fulfilling one’s social and political responsibilities means speaking out when necessary… and what if one’s own social and political views are not considered “honourable” to all others

And then there’s 6.2.18, “To maintain awareness of the need for changes in the public education system and advocate appropriately for such changes through individual or collective action

  • While maintaining the “collective interest”?
  • Only in ways that are deemed “honourable and dignified”?
  • Would changes to this Code count?

There are several points in this Code that I see the value of, and I guess that every educational institution has something in place to keep people accountable… but for a few of the points in this Code, such as above, I know I wouldn’t feel comfortable signing on the dotted line.  Is everything in this Code really necessary?  Is it as unambiguous as possible?  Is it reasonable to expect teachers to follow it all the time?  I don’t think so.  I think that some of its language is vague and at times, if we’re honest, contradictory and/or simply impossible to follow.  And yet teachers are required to follow it.

And this is what bothers me – teachers, the people we are asking to help us teach “critical thinking” to our children, are being told they have to follow a code of conduct this detailed regardless of what their own critical thoughts on it may be.  This doesn’t sound to me like good modelling.(But please correct me if I’m wrong – maybe teachers aren’t required to follow this Code?).

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read here?  Please feel free to let me know 🙂

Staying focused on distraction



Here’s an update on my project.

The first job I set out to do for my major project was to see what the research says about the issue of cell phone distraction in (and out of) the classroom and the effect of multitasking on student success. I gave links to a few articles I’d found on this topic in my previous blog post; however, I’ve done some more digging around and have three more articles that I thought would be worth sharing.  Read on if you’re interested in this topic…

Trudy L. Hanson , Kristina Drumheller , Jessica Mallard , Connie McKee and Paula Schlegel set out to understand how college students spend their time, and published their findings in an article published in 2010 titled “Smart phones, Text Messaging, and Facebook: Competing Time Demands of Today’s College Students.” A three-page survey including a time-diary was administered to 294 students, and 24 students also participated in focus groups. Among several other findings, the authors found that college students spend far more time on communicating (instant messaging and using social media applications) than they spend on their courses outside of class time (surprise, surprise…). For instance, students spent an average of 11.91 hours a week studying, versus an average of 14.35 hours a week using their smart phones for text messaging alone. If, in 2010, students spent an average of 27.77 hours a week communicating on smart phones (this does not include playing video games or using smart phones for uses other than communication),what would that figure be now?

In their 2010 article, “Examining the Affects of Student Multitasking With Laptops During the Lecture,” James M. Kraushaar and David C. Novak analyzed self-reported data from 90 students and actual data (collected by means of the use of spyware installed on laptops) from 41 students to examine the different types of software activity done by students during class, categorize these activities into two types: distractive (not related to the lesson) and productive (related to the lesson), and develop a quantifiable metrics to measure the impact on academic performance that these different types of lap top software use create. They discuss how cognitive overload can occur when students are multitasking, resulting in a diminished ability to create short-term memory. Their results show that students use lap tops for more distractive rather than productive applications; furthermore, they identified an inverse relationship between distractive software activities and learning performance. They also found that students underreported their use of instant messaging and other distractive software activities. In short, multitasking (with lap tops, but we can imagine this applying to phones as well) does has a negative effect on students learning abilities… at least according to this study.

Brian P.cBaile and Joseph A Konstan examined the success of building attention-aware systems on mitigating the effects of interruptions in their paper, “On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state (2006). Participants in this study were given a primary task to complete and a periphery task (the “interruption”) approximately half way through the time span of the primary task. They found that “when peripheral tasks interrupt the execution of primary tasks, users require from 3% to 27% more time to complete the tasks, commit twice the number of errors across tasks, experience from 31% to 106% more annoyance, and experience twice the increase in anxiety than when those same peripheral tasks are presented at the boundary between primary tasks” (685). The study suggests that introducing periphery tasks or information (“interruptions”) at a delayed time, such as at “boundaries during task execution” (706), has the effect of reducing the negative consequences of such interruptions on the task performance, error rate, and affective state.  In other words, having your phone on “do not disturb” and only checking it during breaks between lessons would have a positive effect on your work and on your affective state, according to this study.

For those of you who’d like to read more:

Baile, Brian P. &  Konstan, Joseph A.(2006). On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior 22, 685–708.

Kraushaar, J. M., & Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the affects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 241-251.

Trudy L. Hanson , Kristina Drumheller , Jessica Mallard , Connie McKee & Paula Schlegel (2010) Cell Phones, Text Messaging, and Facebook: Competing Time Demands of Today’s College Students, College Teaching, 59:1, 23-30, DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2010.489078

I’ve also begun thinking about the materials I plan to create for ESL teachers to use for engaging their classes in discussion around cell phone use in the classroom. With permission from a colleague and a signed waiver from her students, I was able to snap some great photos and videos of ESL students both on their phones and actively engaged in conversation.  I plan to incorporate these into a presentation tool (perhaps a video or a screencast) that will be part of the materials package I’m developing.

Anyone with comments or suggestions, please don’t be shy!